Skip to content
Last Dictionary

prosaic alignment

nounAlso: prosaic AI alignment, prosaic AGI

In plain wordsWorking on AI safety by assuming that powerful future AI will be built from today's techniques — scaled-up neural networks — rather than from some new breakthrough.

  1. An approach to AI alignmentAI alignment, n.: Making an AI system genuinely try to do what the people it serves want — not a literal-minded, distorted or self-serving version of it. Also the research field working on this. premised on the possibility that transformative AI will be built by scaling up existing deep learningdeep learning, n.: Machine learning done with neural networks built from many stacked layers: raw data such as pixels, sound or text goes in at one end, and each layer turns what it receives into something more abstract. methods, with no conceptual breakthrough in understanding how intelligence works, so that alignment techniques should be developed for, and tested on, such systems now. Paul Christiano, who named it, argued that if such 'prosaic AGI' is possible, alignment work aimed at unknown future architectures may arrive too late. Prosaic research programs include reinforcement learning from human feedbackreinforcement learning from human feedback, n.: A way of training AI using people's judgments: humans compare pairs of answers, a scoring model learns their preferences, and the AI is then trained to produce answers that score well., scalable oversightscalable oversight, n.: The problem of how people can check and correct AI systems whose work is too difficult, fast or plentiful for humans to judge reliably alone — usually by enlisting AI to help with the checking. methods such as iterated amplificationiterated amplification, n.: A proposed training scheme in which a person, helped by many copies of an AI, solves harder problems than either could alone; a new AI then learns to imitate that team, and the cycle repeats. and debateAI debate, n.: A proposed way to supervise very capable AI: two AI systems argue opposite answers to a question and a human judge decides who argued better, on the theory that lies are easier to expose than to defend., interpretabilityinterpretability, n.: The effort to understand how an AI system arrives at its outputs — what information it uses and how it combines it — instead of treating it as a sealed black box. of neural networksneural network, n.: A kind of computer program that learns a task from examples by tuning thousands to billions of connections between simple number-crunching units, an arrangement loosely inspired by nerve cells in the brain., controlAI control, n.: Safety measures meant to stop a powerful AI from causing serious harm even if it is secretly working against us — like bank security, which assumes some insiders may be dishonest. and model organismsmodel organism of misalignment, n.: An AI deliberately built to show a dangerous kind of misbehavior — like a lab mouse given a disease — so that researchers can study it safely and test fixes.. With the rise of large language modelslarge language model, n.: A computer program trained on enormous amounts of text to predict the words that come next. At vast scale, that simple skill lets it chat, answer questions, translate, summarize and write code., prosaic approaches became the mainstream of the field.

    Most of the lab's agenda is prosaic alignment: oversight and interpretability for the models we actually train.

Origin

Introduced by Paul Christiano in the November 2016 essay 'Prosaic AI alignment', which described prosaic AGI as transformative AI reached by extending current methods, without any deep new understanding of what intelligence is.

Usage note

'Prosaic' is descriptive, not dismissive: it means built from known, unglamorous techniques. Usually contrasted with agent foundationsagent foundations, n.: A research program that tried to work out, with mathematics, how an idealized reasoning agent should think and decide, as groundwork for building AI that stays safe. research, which seeks a theoretical understanding of agency first.

Related

See also
  • AI alignmentAI alignment, n.: Making an AI system genuinely try to do what the people it serves want — not a literal-minded, distorted or self-serving version of it. Also the research field working on this.
  • agent foundationsagent foundations, n.: A research program that tried to work out, with mathematics, how an idealized reasoning agent should think and decide, as groundwork for building AI that stays safe.
  • scalable oversightscalable oversight, n.: The problem of how people can check and correct AI systems whose work is too difficult, fast or plentiful for humans to judge reliably alone — usually by enlisting AI to help with the checking.
  • iterated amplificationiterated amplification, n.: A proposed training scheme in which a person, helped by many copies of an AI, solves harder problems than either could alone; a new AI then learns to imitate that team, and the cycle repeats.
  • interpretabilityinterpretability, n.: The effort to understand how an AI system arrives at its outputs — what information it uses and how it combines it — instead of treating it as a sealed black box.
  • scaling hypothesisscaling hypothesis, n.: The bet that today's AI methods, simply made bigger with more computing power and data, will keep getting smarter — possibly all the way to human-level intelligence and beyond — without needing fundamentally new ideas.
Contrast with
  • agent foundationsagent foundations, n.: A research program that tried to work out, with mathematics, how an idealized reasoning agent should think and decide, as groundwork for building AI that stays safe.

Sources

  1. Christiano, P. (2016). Prosaic AI alignment. AI Alignment blog (ai-alignment.com).

Mentioned in

agent foundationsagent foundations, n.: A research program that tried to work out, with mathematics, how an idealized reasoning agent should think and decide, as groundwork for building AI that stays safe.